Post by account_disabled on Mar 14, 2024 5:41:27 GMT
Political Communication, from Social Media to reality: Trump won! We predicted it: Trump really hit the mark on the main social media and developed a political marketing campaign that ultimately proved successful. Here are the official results that appeared on the Google search engine: capture The American tycoon won in all the states in which he had focused his electoral campaign. And he was right, in defiance of all the predictions which until yesterday went like this (success percentages): FiveThirtyEight: Clinton 71.6%; New York Times/Upshot: Clinton 84%; Huffington Post: Clinton 98%; Predictwise: Clinton 88%; Princeton: Clinton 99%; (betting company): Clinton 79.5%; Source: Panorama.it But who really analyzed the social media of the two candidates? We at Pop Up Magazine, in our previous article, had underlined the importance of effective political communication , and in a world dominated by Social Media, in our opinion, those who used digital tools in a more targeted way, exploiting their great potential, would have won. and invested in a farsighted manner on the web.
And in our opinion, Trump's strategy had hit the mark, focusing on the many dissatisfied Find Your Phone Number with previous administrations, those who wanted change, those who had certain beliefs. And we don't say it's right or wrong, but we have to analyze the facts, that is, what was actually done. And Trump, thanks to a team of industry experts, hit the mark. But this is definitely not a surprise to us. For many months on social media, Trump had received a lot of acclaim: screen-11 Looking at sentiment , Trump's positive sentiment was 8.9% versus Clinton's 7.8%. And although negative sentiment is higher for Trump, the thing to analyze is precisely what seems like the most insignificant data: the percentage of neutrals.
Because Hillary's 69.5% of neutrals against the new president's 62.3% means that the candidate for the White House in her electoral campaign did not take a strong and clear position with respect to the winner, which is one of the main points on which a strategy must be based on the web. Then the number of mentions is clearly in favor of the American tycoon (who sought greater interaction with internet users). Furthermore, it is worth highlighting the number of fans and followers on social media of the two candidates, clearly to Trump's advantage.
And in our opinion, Trump's strategy had hit the mark, focusing on the many dissatisfied Find Your Phone Number with previous administrations, those who wanted change, those who had certain beliefs. And we don't say it's right or wrong, but we have to analyze the facts, that is, what was actually done. And Trump, thanks to a team of industry experts, hit the mark. But this is definitely not a surprise to us. For many months on social media, Trump had received a lot of acclaim: screen-11 Looking at sentiment , Trump's positive sentiment was 8.9% versus Clinton's 7.8%. And although negative sentiment is higher for Trump, the thing to analyze is precisely what seems like the most insignificant data: the percentage of neutrals.
Because Hillary's 69.5% of neutrals against the new president's 62.3% means that the candidate for the White House in her electoral campaign did not take a strong and clear position with respect to the winner, which is one of the main points on which a strategy must be based on the web. Then the number of mentions is clearly in favor of the American tycoon (who sought greater interaction with internet users). Furthermore, it is worth highlighting the number of fans and followers on social media of the two candidates, clearly to Trump's advantage.